ENG 121: Academic Writing (Anna Crerand): Argumentative Essay

The purpose of the “Proposing a Solution essay that would be to persuade, but it is a particular kind of argumentative essay. It involves identifying a challenge, discussing several possible answers to it, and arguing this 1 solution is preferable to others. There are lots of possible topics because of this essay, and you will have considerable freedom in selecting your very own topic; however, there are lots of topics you MAY NOT write on: euthanasia, abortion, capital punishment, gun control, parking, legalization of pot or other illegal drugs, steroids, and changing of the voting age. It does not necessarily have to be the exact same topic you wrote about if you want, your topic can be related to any of your other topics, but. Y

· Identifying the difficulty. At the beginning of your essay, you need to identify the nagging problem under consideration. This may require describing, defining and/or limiting the problem for background support. For example, if starvation could be the problem, you may want to focus on famine in developing countries, on hunger within the U.S., or perhaps even more narrowly, on malnourishment among U.S. children. In this area of the essay, it could also be necessary to establish the issue, to really argue that it exists and that it is a challenge. Some readers, for example, might not believe that technology is expanding very rapidly or, they don’t consider it a problem if they do, maybe. So before discussing solutions, you may have to argue that the issue is both real and worthy of your attention.

· Discussing possible solutions. When the nagging problem happens to be identified, you will definitely move to a discussion of possible methods to the problem. You ought to discuss at least three alternative solutions, and each should really be plausible (believable) and feasible (workable). Far-fetched or solutions that are oversimplified not good in this essay. Proposing for us is far-fetched because it’s not economically possible and therefore not believable that we solve the problem of bad food in the SLU commons by hiring the finest chefs in France to cook. Similarly, suggesting that execution end up being the penalty for several overdue books at the library is simply too simple given our value that is current system not workable. On the other hand, suggesting that the commons implement a quality survey to enhance the cafeteria food or that students with overdue fines at the library cannot receive their grades until those fines are paid will be samples of plausible, feasible solutions. (My note: I like the food within the cafeteria so maybe that topic is off limits.)

· Arguing that one solution is better than others. Your discussion of possible solutions will consist of examining the professionals and cons of every and, because of the final end of this essay, it ought to be clear that one option would be a lot better than most of the others. Like in the position paper, it is essential that you not only assert your own arguments, but also present and react to counterarguments. After you have asserted that this one solution is the very best, the bulk of your paper is supposed to be reasons that are including it is the best, again incorporating research into this section whenever you can.

· Including Counterarguments. Due to the fact that every the solutions you discuss in the essay will likely be plausible and feasible, it is unlikely you will be able to utterly and entirely refute all of them. In fact, you are tempted to claim that all of the solutions should be applied at once. Don’t do this. In order to pass this essay, your thesis must state that, despite the fact that all of the solutions may be helpful, one solution is much better compared to the others. However, this raises the question of what constitutes “better”? There are a number of criteria. Perhaps one solution would solve the problem more thoroughly, more quickly, less expensively, or with less risk. But don’t be worried about these sorts of criteria right now; they’ll develop as the writing is continued by us process.

Details: The essay must certanly be approximately 500 words. Please talk about something you realize about firsthand (meaning nothing that includes to be researched by either you or me to be understood). Topics should originate from your lifetime and can even be related to your task, family, or social situations. Some off-the-top-of-my-head examples are how to get kids to complete chores, how exactly to lower the speed of cars during your neighborhood, getting children to nap, etc. Again, stay glued to topics you know. DON’T USE OUTSIDE SOURCES FOR JUST ABOUT ANY REASON. Please also use MLA format, as your grade is dependent upon it. You’ll want a 25% or lower similarity score as usual; if not, you shall be turned in as a violation for the Honor Code of Saint Leo University for plagiarism. Please ask me for help if you have questions.

Please refer to this LibGuide for information on Counterarguments in addition to a student sample (or two) associated with Proposing a remedy essay. I understand that a number of the restricted topics might actually be topics that are possible within the module. However, please let my restricted topics take precedent, for a reason as I do restrict them. During office hours if you would like me to look over topics, I would be more than happy to do so, so feel free to send an email or meet me. And remember to use the suggestions i have already been giving as comments on your own other graded essays. All the best this week. Knock this essay from the park!